1
Upload existing material
Policies, controls, standards, procedures, architecture diagrams, design documents, certifications, and prior audit material.
AI Workflow Evidence Challenge
AI changed the workflow. Did your evidence keep up?
Start with the policies, controls, standards, certifications, architecture, and design material you already rely on for one workflow. Pulse challenges what they establish, where they conflict, and whether they are specific enough to support execution testing.
Start with what you already rely on. Pulse shows what it establishes, where it conflicts, and whether it’s ready for execution testing.
No rip and replace. No installation. No production access. Start with the material you already rely on.
Practitioner-led review
CPA + CISA-informed methodology
30+ years across risk, controls, audit, and governance
Every finding traces to the material provided
A simple challenge
Give us what you already rely on for one workflow.
Pulse turns the existing material into a testable view, identifies contradictions and missing links, and shows whether a separate execution test is justified.
2
Challenge what it establishes
See what the material supports, what is not found, and where documentation or design artifacts contradict each other.
3
Determine execution-test readiness
Identify the records, joins, fields, and completeness conditions that would be required to test operating effectiveness.
What you receive before you decide
A clear directional summary before a larger engagement.
The initial challenge shows how far the existing documentation and design can support a conclusion and what would be required to go deeper.
A
Coverage and conflict summary
What is established, what is not found, and where documentation and design disagree.
B
Testability summary
Is the governing material specific enough to support an execution test for the selected workflow?
C
Execution-test readiness
What records would be required, what needs to join, and which questions a paid Execution Evidence Baseline could answer.
Whatever the review shows, there is a clear next step
The challenge routes you into the right part of the loop.
You do not have to buy a large engagement before seeing whether Pulse can create value.
Fit or repair the operating standard before execution can be tested.
Resolve where architecture or design artifacts do not support the written claim.
Move into a separate paid Execution Evidence Baseline for scoped event-level results.
Stop here, or proceed to Execution Evidence if operating proof is still required.
Clear value before a larger engagement
Get the direction first. Choose whether to unlock the detail.
The initial challenge gives you a useful high-level summary. Detailed actionable findings and execution results are produced only if you choose to continue.
Included before you decide
Initial Evidence Challenge
- One-workflow documentation and design challenge
- High-level coverage, conflict, and testability summary
- Execution-test readiness and required-record direction
- High-level recommended next step
Paid if you choose to continue
Detailed Findings and Execution Proof
- Detailed findings, interrogation list, and remediation work order
- Fitted updates and control remediation
- Execution Evidence Baseline with scoped event-level results
- Drift quantification for the agreed scope
- Remediation and retesting
Free tells you the direction. Paid establishes the actionable detail and proves execution. The initial challenge does not produce CONFORMED, DEPARTED, CANNOT_ESTABLISH, or NO_GOVERNING_RULE results for workflow events.
Why Pulse
We do not ask you to start over.
Pulse starts with the governance environment you already have, preserves source lineage, and shows whether a separate execution test is worth pursuing.
No rip and replace
Your GRC platform, standards, controls, certifications, and audit history remain useful. Pulse starts with them.
Trace every finding
Documentation and design findings remain tied to the exact source material that supports them.
Define the path to execution
If the material is testable, Pulse defines the inputs needed for a separate paid Execution Evidence Baseline.
Big Four risk and assurance experience
Regulated compliance and audit backgrounds
Deterministic, traceable findings
Practitioner review retained
AI changed the workflow. Start with what you already have.
In 15 minutes, we can determine what one bounded Evidence Challenge would require and whether your current documentation is ready for the next stage.
Book a 15-Minute Fit Call