Named practitioners. Visible accountability.
Team & Authority
Execution Integrity sits at the intersection of controls, systems, governance, assurance, enterprise operations, and technical execution. Pulse is built by practitioners and operators who understand both the organization being governed and the evaluator asking for proof.
Lead practitioners
The people directly shaping the method and commercial work.
Edward J. Beltran, CPA
Arizona CPA. Former Arthur Andersen and PwC Risk Assurance. University of Michigan MBA. CEO, Fierce Inc. Pulse innovator and patent holder. Ed leads the commercial category, assurance framing, buyer translation, and practitioner-signed report direction.
Jesse Hart, MS, PMP
27 years in regulated industries. PMP since 2006. 200+ projects across quality systems, compliance, privacy, and AI governance. Jesse leads methodology, framework translation, evidence discipline, and evaluator-facing rigor.
Broader operating team
Controls, engineering, architecture, delivery, and enterprise operations.
Arvind Prem Krishnan
GRC and assurance practitioner supporting controls, audit-readiness, evidence, and practitioner delivery.
Saravanan Venkatesan
Technical and enterprise architecture leadership supporting implementation, systems integration, and execution-layer design.
Geeta Prem Krishnan
Operations and program support across Pulse delivery, client workflows, and execution-readiness initiatives.
Extended advisors and reviewers
Pulse has used independent and external pressure testing across governance, risk, audit, enterprise architecture, insurance, and practitioner use cases. The scope and relationship of each review should be disclosed rather than implied as an endorsement.
Fierce heritage
Execution Integrity is new. Enterprise accountability is not.
+
Fierce has spent more than 25 years helping organizations improve accountability, decision making, leadership, communication, and execution. Pulse extends that operating heritage into a new technical and assurance problem: whether consequential execution remained aligned with the approved standard and authority in force.
The mission remains to better the world, one conversation at a time. Pulse adds a new responsibility for the automated enterprise: make sure the evidence and control keep up when conversation, policy, and decision become action.
Credibility standard
Authority should be visible without overstating maturity.
What we can say
Pulse has working technical proof, practitioner methodologies, provisional patent protection, defined evidence contracts, runtime checks, reporting, and external design/architecture review artifacts within stated scopes.
What we should not imply
We should not present exploratory enterprise conversations as deployments, practitioner relationships as endorsements, demonstration results as production performance, or Pulse reports as independent CPA audit opinions.